Introduction

Let’s get one thing straight—I’ve always been a hands-on guy (pun intended). The idea of using a male masturbator seemed unnecessary at best, awkward at worst. But after hearing friends rave about toys like the Gawk Gawk 3000 (yes, that’s a real product), curiosity got the better of me.

So, I took the plunge. Here’s my completely unfiltered review of my first time using an automatic masturbator—the surprises, the mishaps, and whether it lived up to the hype.

Choosing My First Male Toy

Manual vs. Automatic Masturbators

I quickly learned there are two main types:

• Manual (like Fleshlights—you do the work)

• Automatic (toys that move/suck on their own)

Since I wanted the full experience, I went for an automatic "dick sucker"—the infamous Gawk Gawk 3000.

Why I Picked the "Gawk Gawk 3000"

• Strong suction claims (mimics oral sex)

• Adjustable speeds (from teasing to turbo)

• Meme-worthy name (how could I resist?)

Unboxing & First Impressions

Packaging & Discretion

The box was plain and nondescript—no embarrassing labels. Inside, the toy looked… intimidating. It had a sleek, techy design—more like a gadget than a sex toy.

Material & Build Quality

The sleeve was ultra-soft silicone (body-safe, thank goodness). The motor housing felt sturdy, though the buttons were a bit cheap.

The Awkward Setup Phase

Lube, Positioning, and Trial Runs

First lesson: Lube is NON-NEGOTIABLE. I used a water-based lube (silicone can damage the toy).

Second lesson: Getting the angle right matters. At first, I fumbled like a teenager with a bra clasp.

Figuring Out the Controls

The Gawk Gawk 3000 had:

• 3 suction modes (gentle, rhythmic, "oh god")

• A confusing button layout (took 3 tries to turn it on)

The Moment of Truth: How It Actually Felt

Sensation Breakdown

• Texture: The inner ridges felt uncannily realistic—like a tongue and lips.

• Suction: The "rhythmic" mode was the star—slow build, intense finish.

• Vibration: Added extra buzz, but the suction stole the show.

Comparison to Manual Masturbation

It was different—not necessarily better, but novel and intense. The hands-free aspect was a game-changer.

Biggest Surprises (Good & Bad)

What Shocked Me in a Good Way

• The suction actually mimicked oral (hence the name).

• Way less effort than using my hand.

• Surprisingly immersive—I zoned out completely.

Things I Wish I Knew Sooner

• Cleanup is a chore (more on that later).

• Noise level: Not loud, but not silent either.

• Takes practice to find the perfect settings.

Is an Automatic Masturbator Worth It?

Pros

✔️ Next-level orgasms (stronger than manual)
✔️ Hands-free convenience (great for lazy days)
✔️ Fun novelty (spices up solo play)

Cons

❌ Expensive ($100–$300 for good ones)
❌ Cleanup takes effort (silicone sleeves need care)
❌ Not discreet (if you have roommates, be cautious)

Tips for First-Time Users

Best Lube for Male Toys

• Water-based (safe for all materials)

• Avoid silicone-based (can degrade the toy)

How to Clean & Maintain It

1. Rinse with warm water + mild soap.

2. Dry thoroughly (bacteria love moisture).

3. Store in a cool, dry place.

Avoiding Common Mistakes

• Don’t skip lube (friction = discomfort).

• Start slow (max speed isn’t always best).

• Charge it fully before first use.

Final Verdict: Would I Use It Again?

Yes—but not every time. It’s a weekend treat, not a daily driver. Perfect for when I want:

• A more intense orgasm

• Hands-free relaxation

• Something different from the usual

Who should buy one?

• Men curious about new sensations

• Those with privacy (no roommates/kids)

• People willing to invest in pleasure tech

Who should skip it?

• If you’re on a tight budget

• If cleanup sounds tedious

• If you prefer simplicity

Conclusion

My first time with a male masturbator was equal parts awkward and amazing. The Gawk Gawk 3000 delivered on its meme-worthy name—it really does suck (in the best way).

Would I recommend it? If you’re open-minded and willing to experiment, absolutely. Just don’t expect it to replace your hand entirely—it’s a complement, not a replacement.